Baccay vs Baccay and Republic, G.R. No. 173138

G.R. No. 173138

Baccay vs Baccay and Republic 

FACTS:
Noel and Maribel were sweethearts. He found Maribel's  snobbish and hard-to get traits attractive.                                          

Around 1997, he decided to break up with Maribel because he was already involved with another woman. They agreed to see each other on a friendly basis but the two had several romantic episodes.

In November 1998, Maribel informed Noel that she was pregnant with his child. Upon advice of his mother, Noel grudgingly married Maribel. The two lived on Noel's  family. Maribel remained aloof and didn't contribute to his family's coffer. She refused to have sex with him.

Sometime in 1999, Noel and Maribel had an intense quarrel about Maribel's alleged miscarriage causing the latter to leave the house and never came back.

Noel filed a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage with the RTC of Manila. RTC declared the marriage null and void on the ground of Maribel's alleged psychological incapacity. Nedy L. Tayag, a clinical psychologist who presented as Noel's witness, found Maribel unable to perform the essential marital obligations of marriage due to a Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

ISSUE:
Whether or not the marriage between Noel and Maribel null and void under Article 36 of the Family Code.

RULING:
No. Noel failed to provide sufficient evidence to sustain a finding that Maribel was psychologically incapacitated. Noel's evidence merely established that Maribel refused to have sexual intercourse with him after their marriage, and that she left him after their quarrel when he confronted her about her alleged miscarriage.      The psychologist failed to establish that  Maribel's alleged Narcissistic Personality Disorder incapacitated her from validly assuming the essential obligations of the marriage. The same psychologist even testified that Maribel was capable of entering into marriage except that it would be difficult for her to sustain one. Mere difficulty, it must be stressed, is not the incapacity contemplated under the Article 36 of the Family Code.

Psychological incapacity must be more than just a "difficulty," a "refusal," or a "neglect" in the performance of some marital obligations. An unsatisfactory marriage is not a null and void marriage.