Santiago vs Bautista

G.R. No. L-25024 March 30, 1970 [Judicial Power]

FACTS:
Teodoro Santiago, a grade 6 pupil, was adjudged 3rd honor. 2 days before his graduation, Ted and his parents sought the invalidation of the ranking of the honor students. They filed a Certiorari case against the principal and teachers who composed the committee on rating honors.. Respondents filed a MTD claiming that the action was improper, and even assuming it was proper, the question has become academic (bc the graduation already proceeded. They also argue that there was no GADALEJ on the part of the teachers since the Committee on Ratings is not a tribunal, nor board, exercising judicial functions, under Rule 65, certiorari is a remedy against judicial function

ISSUE: WoN judicial function be exercised in this case.

RULING:
A judicial function is an act performed by virtue of judicial powers. The exercise of judicial function is the doing of something in the nature of the action of the court. In order for an action for certiorari to exist,
Test to determine whether a tribunal or board exercises judicial functions:
1) there must be specific controversy involving rights of persons brought before a tribunal for hearing and determination.
2) that the tribunal must have the power and authority to pronounce judgment and render a decision.
3) the tribunal must pertain to that branch of the sovereign which belongs to the judiciary (or at least the not the legislative nor the executive)
It may be said that the exercise of judicial function is to determine what the law is, and what the legal rights of parties are, with respect to a matter in controversy.

Judicial power is defined:
•           as authority to determine the rights of persons or property.
•           authority vested in some court, officer or persons to hear and determine when the rights of persons or property or the propriety of doing an act is the subject matter of adjudication.
•           The power exercised by courts in hearing and determining cases before them.
•           The construction of laws and the adjudication of legal rights.

The so-called Committee for Rating Honor Students are neither judicial nor quasi-judicial bodies in the performance of its assigned task. It is necessary that there be a LAW that gives rise to some specific rights of persons or property under which adverse claims to such rights are made, and the controversy ensuring there from is brought in turn, to the tribunal or board clothed with power and authority to determine